Archive for the ‘ General ’ Category

They Don’t Know

By Garrett Hedman

I love 5am mornings, especially when I can walk outside and my glasses can be an anecdote for the lesson on condensation I’m giving in two days. That is, I walk out of the dorms of Delta State University, tie askew, zombiing my way to breakfast, and my glasses fog because of the heat and humidity…at 5am in the morning. What I do for these kids. students. scientists. Yeah, I like scientists.

They don’t know that I’ve woken up at 5am for the past two weeks to make sure I’m the best teacher I can be for them. They don’t know that I’ve been going to bed at 12:30am to finalize lesson plans on atomic structure. They don’t know.

A place of rest and comfort at institute has been an art garden by the Bologna Performing Arts Center. A small fountain sits in the middle of the garden’s entangled pathway of abstract sculptures. I have methodically walked around the edges of the fountain rehearsing my “teacher voice”, an assertive, caring, confident, firm voice. “I see the bronze sculpture is behaving quietly today.” The garden is also where I try to inspire the stone statue without a head that “It can learn. It will learn.” The garden is my education sanctuary.

The scientists don’t know I’ve spent hours rehearsing what I’m going to say to them. That way, when I’m in front of my class, I can act as if my knowledge of chemical bonds is second nature to me. They don’t know.

I’ve worked relentlessly for four years in college to understand how we learn, problem solve, and make decisions. That work means nothing to the students.

I’ve cried over the stories of triumph that have inspired me to teach in the Mississippi Delta. Those tears mean nothing to the students.

But I know. I know what I’ve done.

So I take a breath. I put on a smile, and I say, “Good morning class, my name is Mr. Hedman.”

Asking Questions

Last summer I taught conversational English in Zhengzhou, China through the Orbis Institute. Before I ever entered my own classroom, the expectations were clear of how the students would be learning. While observing other classes I always saw the same thing. Students were in stadium-style seating with immovable chairs. Teachers were at the board as if they were professors at a large university. There was no room for interaction. No room for discussion. I saw teachers write something on the board – say, “Hello! How are you today? Would you like to go to the grocery store?” The teachers would then say the phrase on the board very deliberately, in the best English they could muster. The students, in unison, would respond, seven times out of ten, butchering the pronunciation. “Herro. How are yov tolay? Woul yov like to go to the grofery stove?”  Ugh.

I arrived at my classroom starry-eyed and idealistic with a lesson plan full of activities, games, and group work. I said to myself, I am not like these teachers. I am going to make class fun and interesting, while simultaneously helping them learn more than memorization could ever hope to accomplish. I said to myself, at no time would my classroom be simply an area for students to rehearse the language without ever interacting with it in a real way.

Unfortunately, this was easier said than done. It turns I could not find out which came first, the chicken (teachers) or the egg (students). It was not so much that the students were resistant or difficult to these games and activities – they just did not see the merit in learning language this way. These students had always learned one way, and here I was attempting to teach them another. The students were unfamiliar with the tasks, with the formatting of the lessons, with the usual responses I would be expecting in a western classroom, while I was completely unaccustomed to teaching their way.

I didn’t quite know what to do – there was very little mentoring or assistance, and so I did the only thing I could think of – I asked my students what they wanted. Every day after class, I asked my students what I could improve upon. I asked them: What can I do better?  What do you want in a classroom? What would you like to learn about?

Eventually we were able to reconcile our educational differences, and come to a happy medium. With a fair amount of modeling, (which I was not doing enough of at the beginning anyway), and a healthy supply of activities, I thought the students actually learned something, and had a little bit of fun while doing it.

What I take away from this story, more than anything is the how my students and I went from such opposite poles of educational philosophy to this, by most accounts, happy compromise. It was because I was willing to ask, they were willing to be honest, and we both were willing to compromise, that the summer turned out to be so successful.

I sure hope my students at Breakthrough are opinionated.

Montessori vs. TFA

Two years ago, I was sitting in a circle of chairs with fellow 4th and 5th grade story tellers at a Montessori school in Boulder, CO. I told them the beginning of a story about Rotten Tots the homeless man who was looking for place to live, and then I had each student give an example of what could happen next to Mr. Tots in the story. Their continuations were typical. However, half way around the circle, a 4th grader, let’s call him Mark, had decided that sitting with his head hanging from the chair and his feet up in the air would help him think better. Seeing this as an opportunity to be “innovators”, all the story tellers reversed their direction of sitting, including myself. I commented, “This is it! We can look at a story one way, but looking at it in a different way can be even more exciting!” The learners laughed and thought of incredibly creative examples to continue the story with their head on the ground.

Now, I’m going to tell this story again from a Teach for Americaesque approach according to what I’ve learned through training this week.

Two years ago, I was sitting in a circle of desks with the class of 2016 in an elementary school in Denver, CO (the year indicates the year they will graduate college). I wanted to teach them about brainstorming. I wrote the word “present” on a timeline and drew three different arrows branching from the line to indicate three different paths for the future. I wrote down three things I could be doing at the same time next year: living in Jamaica, playing the piano, or teaching. This was the “I do” part of the lesson. Then, I asked a student, let’s call him Mark, “where do you want to be in one year?” He excitedly answered, “I want to be in 5th grade after passing the state writing test.” This was the “we do” part of the lesson. I gave him a HollaDollar for participating. Afterward, I allowed each student to finish their their own webs, the “you do” part of the lesson plan. As they left class, they had homework to brainstorm three different professions they would want to work in, which would allow me to know more about the students and know whether or not they understand brainstorming.

What a difference!? To only imagine what students learned in each lesson! I’m a Dewyist, discovery-man at heart, but I’m very interested in seeing how Teach for America changes how I think about education.

Teacher as a Learner: Why I am still a student

I’ve been asked why I want to become a teacher probably 734 times in the last two years. I love the question, really I do, but I never feel like I have the right answer. And it always seems to change.

  • “I can’t not work with kids. They are inspiring, amazing, and goofy. Who wouldn’t want to spend their day in a classroom?”
  • “I love math, and kids are awesome. Math + awesome kids = math teacher.”
  • “Education is a critical social issue and I want to be a part of the group of people making a difference.”
  • “Who wouldn’t want a career with the salary, prestige, and social opportunity teaching provides”… oh wait…. woops… they’re still working on that on.

Seriously though. The question of why am I studying to be an educator feels, at times, of dire importance. I figured out yet another answer last week. I was sitting through a forum session in my MfA orientation, and the two panelists were my future teacher advisors.

Halfway through the session, while answering the question, “What should we do to maximize our experience in our masters programs,” one of them paused, scrunched up his face, and in the most wonderful New York accent said:

Look. You do what you want. You read what they give you, you watch the teachers they tell you too. Whateva. Thats not the point. The point is you have a year to learn how to be the best learner you can be. Because those are the best teachers, in my opinion. The ones who learn. Who listen to their students and know where they’re at. You’ve got to take control of your learning and figure out what is going to make you a better student first. That’s whats going to make you a good teacher.

Nothing new. Nothing too profound… I mean, I’ve heard the phrase teacher as learner before. The social constructivists love it: you are the “lead learner” in your classroom. I buy it… but something about what Derrell said stuck with me the rest of the day.

I want to be a teacher because I love being a student. I love learning. I love finding new ways to teach and discovering new things to teach. I love working with people who can show me something new. I love the classroom. And geek-ely I love math. It somehow made sense. So I have, now, another answer to the oft asked-question. I want to be a teacher because I love to learn.

And this is a good thing, as this week I begin a year long masters program here in NYC. This is going to be an incredibly intense year of learning and teaching, and I am so excited to be blogging along the way.

What is your threshold for pain?

I recently met with my cooperating teacher from where I will be student teaching, Rachel (Not her real name), a veteran of 5 years. She teaches debate, American Literature, and AP language. Through the few times we have met, it has become abundantly clear that her passion lies not with the content, but in the success of her students.  I liked her immediately. At our most recent meeting, Jeni asked me something that scared me, confused me, and made me want to hide a little bit. She asked me a question that no one has ever asked me before at any level of my schooling. She asked me, “Nate, what is your threshold for pain?”

Wow.

How does one answer this question? What is your threshold for pain? I have had my wisdom teeth removed – does that answer the question? I had my arm dislocated when I was a six – but I really don’t remember what that felt like, so that shouldn’t count either, right?

What is your threshold for pain?

Maybe she was more referring to my capacity for pain academically. I’ve pulled approximately 13 all-nighters in my academic career – writing papers, studying for multiple-choice tests, and memorizing lines from Shakespeare plays – but does this illustrate my threshold for pain? Does this help describe how much I can take?

What is your threshold for pain?

Perhaps she was referring to something else entirely. Conceivably, she was citing what I’ve heard many times before, from many different teachers – that teaching is the hardest job in the world. Perhaps she was referring to the profession where working 40-hour weeks would be a luxury, and not caring about your students is the eighth deadly sin. Perhaps she was referring to the profession where my paycheck will be an insult to paychecks, and so I’ll judge debate tournaments not only to be there for my students, but also to help make ends meet.

What is your threshold for pain?

I’m not sure. Maybe she was referring to all of these – maybe none of them. Either way, I start training to teach summer school this week. I guess I’ll find out how much threshold for pain I have soon enough.

I do know one thing though.  I’m excited to find out.