KIPP-notized

by Janessa Jordan

For the past three days, I (and my other 26 classmates) have been an active fly on the wall at the KIPP DIAMOND Academy new student orientation. All of the KIPP students attend school for two weeks in the summer, and the new KIPPsters, ranging from grade 5-8, have two extra days of orientation before the returners start summer school. On our first day of KIPP orientation, the air conditioning was broken, so 200 students, roughly 50 adults, and all of the admin staff was sitting in a hot, sticky, auditorium for four hours.  KIPP focuses heavily on structure, community, and consistency. For the first two days, all of the new students were directed to sit on the floor, in rows, SLANTing (Sit up, Listen, Ask and Answer questions, Nod, and Track the speaker), while practicing math, reading, social studies, and science problems with the teachers. All of the KIPP students are expected to come to school with their homework completed, with the heading written perfectly. If students come to school with incomplete homework or with incorrect heading, the students’ parents are contacted by the teachers and the students sit separately at lunch to finish their work–a “working lunch.” Students are even expected to line up silently and uniformly to the bathroom, waiting for the rest of their classmates to use the restroom, all while standing quiet and still, hands at their sides, looking ahead until the other 100 or so students finish their restroom break.

One of my personal teaching goals is to deconstruct the classroom, so as to let students become the beacons of their own learning, rather than solely regurgitating information from the authority figure (the teacher). I believe that students need to be taught to be self-disciplined, creative, and assertive, which I believe isn’t being taught in urban classrooms today. Furthermore, I believe that knowledge is a fluid entity that isn’t a mere nugget given from the teacher to the student, but rather an ongoing process of construction and transformation that combines experience with information–tension is the real root of learning. Thus, all of the structure and uniformity made me uncomfortable throughout the first two days. Why was it so important that the students sit on the floor without talking? Why were the students subject to long hours of sitting and engaging, SLANTing and working, all while being still? What were the students really learning from this experience other than to do something simply because an authority figure told them to?

Today was our third observational day. This was the first day that all of the returning KIPPsters came to school to join their classmates in summer school. As soon as I walked in, I was greeted by two smiling 8th grade KIPP students who welcomed me into their building. Their building. Later, the students all stood the chant the school’s mantra. I don’t remember the whole cheer, but the last part of it was a call and response where the teacher yelled, “Today is who’s day?” to which the students replied, “Our day!” “Who’s day?”

Our Day!

The students broke up into smaller learning academies for their academic classes and I was assigned to the sixth graders. Their writing assignment was to read the Memphis City School statistics regarding rates of graduation and college readiness.

67% graduate high school

24% enroll in college

6% of students are college-ready

Students were asked to respond to these statistics, choosing one, and responding as to why they believed these statistics were true. Then, students were asked to write about ways that they would make sure that all 100% of KIPPsters would graduate from high school, college ready, prepared to change the world.

6th graders.

These students are truly learning to own their school, their educations, and work to change their peace of the world. Although I haven’t given up my  deconstructionist philosophy, I’m looking forward to learning all the KIPP has to teach me about running a school of high expectations and high student achievement.

It’s official. I’ve been KIPP-notized.

    • CarolineSF
    • July 16th, 2010 10:11pm

    KIPP-notized as in selling out your principles in the hope of a paying job, you mean.

    When my daughter was in 7th grade, 3 years ago, I took her to visit a local KIPP school (KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy), and she asked me to enroll her so she could lead an uprising of the oppressed masses.

    • Janessa Jordan
    • July 17th, 2010 9:16pm

    Hi Caroline,

    Thank you so much for reading our blog! I had no idea that we had readers all the way from San Francisco following our journeys.

    To respond to your comment, I have been honored to be at KIPP as a part of my teaching program. My classmates and I have been a part of school this week to observe the leadership and instructional practices of the KIPP school. I am not planning on working at KIPP this year. Honestly, before my observation (and even during my first few days of observation), I would have said that I would never work at KIPP. Long hours, militaristic classroom management, weeding out process of students, yada yada yada. After having been at KIPP this whole week, I would say that my negativity towards KIPP has completely changed.

    As I said in my post, KIPP focuses on structure, consistency, and community. I admit that in many ways I thought that the KIPP model fundamentally contradicted my own personal constructivist teaching philosophy. It seemed that students were being indoctrinated by the values and standards put forth by the school.

    However…

    Everything KIPP does is linked to teaching students how to survive in the real world.

    Students sit on the floor for the first days so they can earn sitting in a chair or a desk. This seems harsh, but students learn that they have to work in order to receive things in life. Chairs are a privilege. A desk is a privilege. Students demonstrate their ability to engage in class without desks, then when they finally receive desks at the beginning of the regular school year, they appreciate them much more than if they were given desks on the first day. This process of earning privileges, then, links with their fundamental philosophy of “Work hard. Get smart.” They teach their students that “being smart” really has nothing to do with “being.” Rather, learning is contingent upon consistent hard work. Therefore, students who want to be smart can only become smart through working.

    What could be better to teach low performing, low income students that “being smart” is actually based on working hard, rather than in-born characteristics? In one activity this Thursday, the students wrote about times when they felt that they were dumb and what lead them to believe this. Many students felt that they were dumb because of something a teacher had told them or a riddle that they heard on tv that they couldn’t figure out. The students shared that because they felt that they were dumb, they didn’t ever believe that they could be smart. KIPP breaks students of this paradigm that intellectual ability is based on in-born characteristics. Instead, students are compelled to work hard because they want to “get smart.”

    Furthermore, the structure that KIPP boosts is for the purpose of giving students constraints through which they can use their freedom well. Although students are required to SLANT during class, they are also given leadership roles and taught to value community over self. In the 6th grade class, when students answer questions, they address the class as “Team and Family” before answering questions, help their “family” out if someone loses a pencil, and assist “family” members who get a wrong answer.

    KIPP is structured, rigorous, and communal. It requires students give their all to their learning community. However, as a KIPP-skeptic myself, I was blown away by how much learning took place this week during the day. The students that come to KIPP need the structure, rigor, and community because they likely are not getting any of those values at home or in alternative schools throughout the city. Students’ learning is not jeopardized by defiance, incompetent instructors, or unsafe learning environments, conditions that are present in many inner city schools.

    Yes, KIPP is hard. But college is hard, too. If the American education system truly wants to help students thrive in college and achieve their dreams, they need to actually provide learning environments for students to do so. I believe KIPP has many positive values and I’m eager to hear how they help students achieve in the future.

    Caroline, I’d love to hear your thoughts about what specifically your daughter didn’t like about the KIPP system. I’ll tell you that students are not being oppressed. At least not at KIPP Memphis. They apply, interview, and choose to go to school there, leaving the door open to leave at any time. The students know what they’re getting themselves into and benefit from the structure and rigor.

    • Alive for What Matters
    • July 18th, 2010 2:28am

    As a member of the group visiting KIPP these two weeks, I can attest to the mind-blowing success that that foundation is having with urban students.

    From the outside, KIPP Diamond Academy Memphis does not impress its viewers or cause them to visualize majestic halls of learning or even students happily engaged in their work. The inside, even with freshly painted walls, would not give those impressions either, were it not for the smiling children who fill the halls and rooms with their excitement to be in a place of such greatness.

    I’ll admit, as would anyone else who visits KIPP on the first day, that it is not easy to stand and help perfect behavior that is already perfect by typical urban school standards. However, I will also admit like most others who spend more than a few days in a KIPP school that it quickly becomes obvious that behavior is not being corrected for behavior’s sake. Every single individual over the age of 20 in that building is there not to manage behavior, but to create an environment where it is possible for EVERY SINGLE STUDENT to achieve to his or her greatest potential. How often in the public education system does there arise an institution that you can make this claim for? Answer that question for yourself, if you will…

    I will not make this too lengthy – I just want to make sure that readers understand the intentions behind expectations that could be easily interpreted as oppressive if not scrutinized. The passionate, driven educators at KIPP DIAMOND Academy are doing for the children in that building what no one else has been able to do yet – they fostering LEARNING in their lives. And we all know what true learning leads to… Who doesn’t deserve that?

    What day is it? THEIR day.

    • Skeptic
    • July 18th, 2010 3:59pm

    Interesting postings but I still have a reservation or two. I taught in an inner city urban environment for several years and I can appreciate the benefits of compliance training for allowing teaching and learning to take place.

    My concern is, however, the long-term results of this kind of conditioning. While it certainly assists in the traditional model of education and its desired outcomes, what happens when these students are actually in the “real world” as you named it?

    When politicians or corporations do unthinkable things (think worldwide economic disaster, rendition, torture, in other words, today’s government/corporate culture) what will these compliant children do in reaction?

    Will there years of KIPP training prevent them from activities such as protesting, acting up, and otherwise making the public square dangerous for corporations and governments? Will they stay in line, not speak out, and follow orders at all times?

    What will be the effect on our democracy in the not-perfect real world where independence, free thought, individualism, and non-conformity used to be seen as essential ingredients of making America what it is and achieving the promise of what it could become?

    I’m impressed with how the KIPP program has achieved its goals and how they ensure those goals are maintained at all costs. I’m just not sure that those goals are good for America or good for these students in the long run. Did we decide that making urban children into middle class behavioral experts who are more likely to comply with the status quo was the goal of public education?

    • Jack Covey
    • July 18th, 2010 5:41pm

    Dear Janessa,

    I’m a big fan of THE ONION (as you will soon see), so I hope you and the other KIPP-STERS have a good sense of humor.

    I did a little parody of some of your post, with changes here and there, while retaining most of your wording.

    (Being from San Francisco, I think Caroline will get the joke better than you):

    - – - – - – - – - -

    “Dear Caroline (and Congressman Leo Ryan):

    “Honestly, before my observation here (and even during my first few days of observation), I would have said that I would never work at FEINBERTOWN, Guyana. Long hours, militaristic classroom management, the weeding-out process of disciples, yada yada yada. After having been at FEINBERTOWN, Guyana this whole week, I would say that my negativity towards REVEREND MIKE FEINBERG, REVEREND DAVID LEVIN, and FEINBERTOWN has completely changed.

    “As I said in my post, FEINBERTOWN focuses on structure, consistency, and community. I admit that in many ways I thought that the FEINBERTOWN model fundamentally contradicted my own personal constructivist secular humanist philosophy. It seemed that FEINBERTOWN disciples were being indoctrinated by the values and standards put forth by the FEINBERGTOWN leaders.

    “However…

    “Everything REVEREND’s FEINBERG and LEVIN do is linked to teaching disciples and would-be disciples how to survive in the sinful, secular humannist world outside FEINBERTOWN.

    “In FEINBERTOWN, new, would-be disciples sit on the floor for the first days so they can earn sitting in a chair or a desk. This seems harsh, but would-be disciples at FEINBERTOWN learn that they have to work in order to be right in the eyes of God. Chairs are a privilege reserved only for true disciples. At FEINBERTOWN, a desk is a privilege. True disciples of REVEREND FEINGBERG and REVEREND LEVIN demonstrate their ability to engage in class without desks, then when they finally receive desks later on in their life at FEINBERTOWN, these newly-saved disciples appreciate them much more than if they were given desks on the first day.

    “Reverend Feinberg’s process of earning privileges then links with FEINBERGTOWN’s fundamental philosophy of ‘Work hard. Get SAVED.’ Reverend Levin and the other FEINBERTOWN leaders teach their disciples that ‘being saved’ really has nothing to do with ‘being.’ Rather, learning in FEINBERTOWN is contingent upon consistent hard work. Therefore, would-be disciples who want to be saved can only become saved and filled with the knowledge of Godly life that Reverend Levin and Reverend Feinberg impart and through the hard work they out our God demands of us.

    “What could be better to teach low performing, low income, would-be disciples that ‘being saved’ from the evils of sin and secular humanism is actually based on working hard, rather than in-born characteristics? In one activity this Thursday, would-be disciples wrote about times in the sinful, secular humanist life when they felt that they were dumb and how some non-believer in Reverend Feinberg’s system led them to believe this.

    “Prior to life in FEINBERTOWN, would-be disciples felt that they were dumb because of something a secular humanist teacher had told them, or because of a riddle that they heard on secular humanist TV that they couldn’t figure out.

    “These would-be disciples shared that because they felt that they weren’t yet saved at the time, they didn’t ever believe that they could be right in the eyes of God. The teachings and practices of REVEREND’s MIKE FEINBERG and DAVID LEVIN break new, would-be disciples of this paradigm that intellectual ability and spirituality are based on in-born characteristics. Instead, disciples of Reverend’s Feinberg and Levin are compelled to work hard because they want to ‘get saved and be right with God.’

    “Furthermore, the structure that FEINBERTOWN boosts is for the purpose of giving disciples constraints through which they can use their freedom well.

    “Although disciples in FEINBERTOWN are required to SLANT during class, they are also given leadership roles and taught to value the FEINBERTOWN community over self. In the 6th grade Bible study class, when students answer questions, they address the class as ‘Team and FEINBERTOWN Family’ before answering questions, help their ‘FEINBERTOWN family’ out if someone loses a pencil, and assist ‘FEINBERTOWN family’ members who get a wrong answer.

    “FEINBERTOWN is structured, rigorous, and communal. REVEREND’s FEINBERG and LEVIN require students give their all to their FEINBERTOWN community. However, as a previous FEINBERTOWN-skeptic myself, I was blown away by how much godly worship and discipling took place this week during the day in FEINBERTOWN. Reverend Feinberg and Reverend Levin’s disciples that come to FEINBERTOWN need the structure, rigor, and community because they likely are not getting any of those values in their god-less home, or in the alternative schools in the sinful, secular humanist world outside FEINBERTOWN.

    “FEINBERTOWN family members’ Godly learning and spiritual well-being is not jeopardized by defiance, incompetent instructors, or unsafe learning environments — conditions that are present in many inner city schools in the sinful world outside FEINBERTOWN.

    “Yes, FEINBERTOWN is hard. But life in the sinful, secular humanist world outside JONESTOWN is hard, too. If the non-believers in the ways and practices of FEINBERTOWN—those in secular humanist society—truly want to help would-be disciples thrive in this sinful world and achieve their dreams, they need to actually provide learning environments just like the one in FEINBERTOWN, Guyana for potenial disciples to do so. I believe FEINBERTOWN has many positive values and I’m eager to hear how they help the disicples here achieve in the future and lead a godly life.

    “Caroline (and Congressman Ryan), I’d love to hear your thoughts about what specifically your daughter didn’t like about the FEINBERTOWN discipling system.

    “I’ll tell you that disciples are not being oppressed here at FEINBERTOWN. Those are just lies told by disgruntled fall-away disicples from FEINBERGTOWN Fresno(and also FEINBERGTOWN Atlanta). These bitter, failed disciples at FEINBERGTOWN Fresno simply could not cut it. Because of the lukewarm, lazy, and rebellious natures that they brought with them from the secular world outside FEINBERGTOWN — and refused to repent of and abandon — they were asked to leave FEINBERGTOWN Fresno. Then, rather than face their own failings, these bitter fallaways chose instead to make up lies and slander about FEINBERGTOWN Fresno’s REVEREND CHI TSCHANG, one of our greatest and wondrous leaders. This led to a campaign of relentless and insidious persecution from both the media and the Fresno Unified School Board against REVEREND TSCHANG, leading both he and FEINBERGTOWN to flee Fresno… but I digress.

    “Anyway, no abuse of any kind occurs here at FEINBERTOWN Guyana. Would-be disciples of Reverend’s Feinberg and Levin apply, interview, and choose to go FEINBERTOWN , leaving the door open to leave at any time. These would-be disciples of Reverend’s Feinberg and Levin know what they’re getting themselves into and benefit from the structure and rigor that REVEREND FEINBERB, REVERNEND LEVIN, and JONESTOWN provide.”

    “Love,

    “Janessa Jordan”

    • Janessa Jordan
    • July 18th, 2010 7:20pm

    @Skeptic

    Thanks for stopping by, Skeptic.

    Prior to visiting KIPP, I shared your concern about the “long term effects of compliance” on the students. Even after the first day, I was still skeptical about the long term benefits for students. I consider myself a constructivist teacher, so I continually questioned if the structure would merely reproduce cookie-cutter kids.

    Let me share with you a story that quelled my concerns.

    While standing in line for the bathroom, students were instructed to stand with both feet in a tile on the floor, one tile apart, and look forward. As the teacher walked around, she was checking to make sure the students were “tracking” forward. One girl was looking down at her feet in line. The teacher came up to her and said, “Track forward, please.” The girl raised her head, but wouldn’t meet the teacher’s eyes. The teacher stood next to her and said, “Look me in the eye. Look at me.” The girl reluctantly complied. The teacher continued,

    “Don’t be afraid of me. I’m not saying anything mean to you. In your life, there will be people who try and intimidate you. They’ll try and prevent you from reaching your dreams. You have to practice not backing down and show them that you’re not going to be intimidated by them. You’re a strong woman. Show it.”

    KIPP reminds me a lot of Air Force Academy. The first year is highly structured, students aren’t allowed to leave the premises but once or twice a semester, and honestly, freshman year is pretty miserable for the cadets. However, as they continue on in their academic career, students are gradually afforded more freedom and more leadership opportunities to use that freedom to lead the other cadets. It’s hard to sympathize with the KIPP model if you see only one part of it. But, seeing how the part fits in with the whole gives me confidence that their model does not nullify the students’ independence, but rather, provides them constraints for them to earn freedom and leadership.

    • Janessa Jordan
    • July 30th, 2010 9:43pm

    Sure, you can post this in your blog. Thanks for asking first!

  1. No trackbacks yet.